Racial Wealth Equity Research and Conversation Series: The Great Wealth Transfer
December 17, 2024
On December 17, more than 130 people came together online for the latest installment of Boston Indicators’ Racial Wealth Equity Research and Conversation Series, focused on how elements of the coming “Great Wealth Transfer” will affect racial wealth gaps.
The Great Wealth Transfer, the passing down of tens of trillions of dollars in assets from the estates of the Baby Boomer generation to their heirs, will represent a seismic shift in wealth, and there are signs that the transfer is primed to exacerbate existing racial wealth gaps. In his presentation, Michael Neal, Housing Finance Policy Center Senior Fellow at the Urban Institute, highlighted a compendium of data to back that conclusion, including that older White Americans (over age 58) hold 70 times the assets of older Black Americans: $70 trillion versus $900 billion.
That gap is further exacerbated by the racial homeownership gap—over 64 percent of White households own their own homes versus 40 percent of Black households—and the fact that White homeowners typically own homes in better condition and of higher value than Black homeowners. In addition, research shows that Black families are less likely to have wills or estate plans that protect and ease the transfer of liquid assets.
Together, those gaps suggest that without significant reforms, the intergenerational transfer of assets will likely increase the homeownership gap and wealth gap, Neal said, a gap that is also likely being underestimated today because measures do not include payouts from life insurance premiums—where White households are more likely to have life insurance policies and higher value policies than Black households.
Faced with that data, a panel moderated by Carmen Panacopoulos, Senior Business Strategy Manager for Regional & Community Outreach at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, sought to surface some ways to close these impending gaps. Olivia Barrow Strauss, Vice President of Neighborhood Development at JP Morgan Chase Foundation, said for their part, JPMC and the foundation were investing in increasing access to affordable housing options to reduce the homeownership gap while seeking to make the costs of ownership more manageable for homeowners in the face of rising insurance and other expenses. Barrow Strauss said the bank was also working to reduce bias in the appraisal space, where homes owned by Black families or in Black neighborhoods are summarily assessed for less than similar homes owned by Whites.
Alex Camardelle, Vice President of Policy & Research at Kindred Futures, pointed to several policy opportunities, sharing his own family’s experience inheriting a home but then being unable to afford the property taxes on the inherited asset. In addition to property tax reforms, Camardelle highlighted opportunities to craft down payment assistance programs based more on wealth than income. He also noted the impact of climate policies, as climate resilience (or a lack thereof) can be reflected in both prices and the cost and likelihood of rebuilding. Lastly, he also called for policies that encourage investment in energy efficiency and protect housing from the speculative market.
Event Agenda:
Welcome and Opening Remarks
Kelly Harrington, Senior Research Manager, Boston Indicators
Research Presentation
Michael Neal, Senior Fellow, Housing Finance Policy Center, Urban Institute
Panel Discussion and Audience Q&A
Olivia Barrow Strauss, Vice President, Neighborhood Development, JP Morgan Chase Foundation
Alex Camardelle, Vice President, Policy & Research, Kindred Futures
Dara Eskridge, CEO, Invest STL
Sohrab Kohli, Program Officer, Prudential Financial
Michael Neal, Senior Fellow, Housing Finance Policy Center, Urban Institute
Carmen Panacopoulos, Senior Business Strategy Manager, Regional & Community Outreach, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Moderator)
Dara Eskridge, CEO of Invest STL, echoed both Barrow Strauss’ concerns over inequitable valuations and Camardelle’s point about making it easier for heirs to keep inherited homes. She also underscored that even the most beneficial policies on paper can have unintended consequences if they are designed and implemented without the active input of and connection to the local community. By providing direct investment, seeking out and utilizing neighborhood-based services for construction, food, and other services, and partnering with local government, communities can reduce the risk of displacement during reinvestment.
Sohrab Kohli, a Program Officer at Prudential Financial, also noted the need for financial planning to help families navigate the transfer of assets beyond housing. Failure to plan for the ownership transfer of businesses, for example, can have significant adverse effects on both the business and the community that depends upon it.
In the end, Neal noted that housing is one large piece of what has to be a broader discussion of wealth. “Wealth diversity is important. Homes are less liquid assets—and the lack of liquid assets can create challenges in the case of emergencies,” he said. “(But) you can't live in your retirement assets—it's also about a place to live, a place to call home."